[Features of the Reperfusion Therapy for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction According to the Russian Registry of Acute Myocardial Infarction - REGION-IM].

AIM: Based on data from the Russian REGION-IM registry, to study the features of reperfusion therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in real-life clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: REGION-IM is a multicenter prospective observational study. The observational period is divided into 3 stages: during the stay in the hospital and at 6 and 12 months after inclusion in the registry. The patient's records contain demographic and history data; information about the present case of MI, including the time of the first symptom onset, first contact with medical personnel, and admission to the hospital; coronary angiography (CAG) data, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) data, and information about the thrombolytic therapy (TLT). RESULTS: Reperfusion therapy was performed in 88.9 % of patients with STEMI. Primary PCI (pPCI) was performed in 60.6 % of patients. The median time from the onset of symptoms to pPCI was 315 minutes [195; 720]. The median time from ECG to pPCI was 110 minutes [84;150]. Isolated TLT was performed in 7.4 %, pharmaco-invasive treatment tactics were used only in 20.9 % of cases. The median time from ECG to TLT (prehospital and in-hospital) was 30 minutes [10; 59], whereas the median time from ECG to prehospital TLT was 18 minutes [10; 39], and in 63 % of patients, TLT was performed more than 10 minutes after diagnosis. PCI followed TLT in 73 % of patients. CONCLUSION: The frequency of reperfusion therapy for STEMI in the Russian Federation has increased considerably in recent years. The high frequency of pPCI is noteworthy, but the timing of pPCI does not always comply with clinical guidelines. The results of this registry confirm the high demand for pharmaco-invasive strategies in real-life clinical practice. Taking into account geographical and logistical features, implementing timely myocardial reperfusion requires prehospital TLT. However, the TLT frequency in the Russian Federation is still insufficient despite its proven maximum effectiveness in the shortest possible time from the detection of acute MI.

Features of Parenteral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients With Myocardial Infarction According to the Russian Register of Acute Myocardial Infarction - REGION-IM.

Aim      To study specific features of the parenteral anticoagulant therapy for acute myocardial infarction (MI) in the Russian Federation and to evaluate the consistency of the prescribed parenteral anticoagulant therapy with the effective clinical guidelines.Material and methods  REGION-MI, the Russian rEGIstry for acute myOcardial iNfarction, is a multicenter observational study. This registry includes all patients admitted to hospitals with a documented diagnosis of ST-elevation acute MI (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation acute MI (NSTEMI) based on the criteria of the Forth Universal Definition of MI of the European Society of Cardiology. Risk of bleeding was assessed with the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) scale, and risk of major bleeding in patients with NSTEMI was additionally assessed with the CRUSADE scale.Results From November 01, 2020 through April 03, 2022, 5025 patients were included into the REGION-MI registry. At primary vascular departments, 70.5% of patients were administered unfractionated heparin (NFH); at regional vascular centers, 37.1 % of patients were administered NFH, 29.6 % enoxaparin, 20,2% NFH in combination with enoxaparin, 6.8 % fondaparinux, 4.2 % NFH in combination with fondaparinux, and 1.9 % nadroparin. At the prehospital stage, NFH was used as an anticoagulant support for the thrombolytic therapy (TLT) in 84% of patients, and low-molecular heparins (LMH) were used in 16 %. At the hospital stage, UFH was administered to 64.4 % of patients, and enoxaparin was administered to 23.9 % of patients. Among the patients who had undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 40 % received NFH, 25 % enoxaparin, 22 % NFH in combination with enoxaparin, 7 % fondaparinux, and 4 % NFH in combination with fondaparinux. In conservative and invasive tactics of therapy for NSTEMI, NFH was also administered more frequently (43 and 43 %, respectively), followed by (according to frequency of administration) enoxaparin (36 and 34 %, respectively), NFH in combination with enoxaparin (10 and 16 %, respectively), fondaparinux (7 and 6 %, respectively), and NFH in combination with fondaparinux (3 and 1 %, respectively).Conclusion      According to the Russian registry of acute MI, REGION-MI, with all strategies for the treatment of MI, parenteral anticoagulants are not prescribed in full consistency with clinical guidelines. The most frequently used parenteral anticoagulant is NFH. Despite the high efficacy and safety of fondaparinux, the frequency of its administration remains unjustifiably low not only in the Russian Federation but also in other countries. The same can be said about the administration of enoxaparin to patients who had received TLT. Attention should be paid to physicians' awareness of recent clinical guidelines, to minimize the prehospital treatment with parenteral anticoagulants, to limit this treatment to the TLT support, and to provide continuity between all stages of medical care.